19:0046(5)AR - VA Medial Center, Lincoln, NE And AFGE Local No. 2219 -- 1985 FLRAdec AR
[ v19 p46 ]
19:0046(5)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
19 FLRA No. 5
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER,
LINCOLN, NEBRASKA
Activity
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL NO. 2219
Union
Case No. O-AR-924
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of
Arbitrator Russell C. Neas filed by the Activity under section 7122(a)
of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425
of the Authority's Rules and Regulations.
The parties submitted several issues to arbitration, one of which the
Arbitrator framed as whether management violated the parties' collective
bargaining agreement by refusing to negotiate over changes in the
incentive award system. The Arbitrator determined that the criteria
governing incentive awards is a mandatory subject of bargaining and that
consequently the Activity violated the parties' agreement when it
refused to bargain over modifications or substitutions of criteria
governing incentive awards. Accordingly, the Arbitrator awarded, in
pertinent part, as follows:
Management violated the Contract by refusing to negotiate with
the Union over changes in the Incentive Awards System. Management
is hereby directed, upon request by the Union, to bargain in good
faith concerning any proposed changes or changes implemented since
March 19, 1984.
In one of its exceptions, the Activity contends that the award is
contrary to section 7106(a) of the Statute. Specifically, the Agency
maintains on the basis of Louis A. Johnson Veterans Administration
Medical Center, Clarksburg, West Virginia and American Federation of
Government Employees, Local 2384, 15 FLRA No. 74 (1984), that the award
is deficient as contrary to section 7106(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the
Statute. The Authority agrees.
In Louis A. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center the
Authority found deficient an arbitration award ordering the activity to
negotiate with the union concerning the decision of the activity to
modify the criteria governing incentive awards. In this respect the
Authority explained that an integral aspect of management's exercise of
its right to direct employees under section 7106(a)(2)(A) and to assign
work under section 7106(a)(2)(B) is to prescribe the standards which an
employee must attain in order to be eligible for a reward for superior
performance. Id. at 5 (citing National Treasury Employees Union and
Internal Revenue Service, 14 FLRA 463 (1984) (proposals 1-2)). Thus,
the Authority ruled that the arbitration award was deficient as contrary
to section 7106(a) to the extent that it subjected the activity's
decision to modify the criteria governing incentive awards to
negotiation and the Authority modified the award accordingly. In terms
of this case, the award is likewise deficient as contrary to section
7106(a) to the extent it subjects the Activity's decision to modify or
substitute criteria governing incentive awards to negotiation.
Accordingly, the award as to this issue is modified to provide as
follows: /1/
Management is hereby directed, upon request by the Union, to
bargain in good faith concerning procedures and appropriate
arrangements for employees adversely affected by any proposed
changes or changes concerning the modification or substitution of
criteria governing incentive awards since March 19, 1984.
See id. at 5-6. Issued, Washington, D.C., July 11, 1985
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ In view of this decision, it is not necessary to address the
other exception to the award.