26:0177(20)CA - DOD, Army, McAlester Army Ammunition Plant and AFGE Local 2815 -- 1987 FLRAdec CA
[ v26 p177 ]
26:0177(20)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
26 FLRA No. 20
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
McALESTER ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
Respondent
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES,LOCAL 2815, AFL-CIO
Charging Party
Case No. 6-CA-1041
(20 FLRA No. 73)
DECISION AND ORDER ON REMAND
I. Introduction
This case is before the Authority pursuant to a remand from the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The court granted the Authority's unopposed motion and remanded the case
for further consideration in the light of the decision in the Ninth
Circuit in Federal Employees Metal Trades Council v. FLRA, 778 F.2d 1429
(9th Cir. 1985) (FEMTC). In FEMTC, the court reversed and remanded the
Authority's determinations in Federal Employees Metal Trades Council,
AFL-CIO and Department of the Navy, Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo,
California, 16 FLRA 619 (1984), and American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 1533 and Department of Navy, Navy Commissary Store
Region, Oakland, and Navy Commissary Store, Alameda, California, 16 FLRA
623 (1984). In those cases, the Authority had determined that proposals
concerning paycheck distribution were outside the duty to bargain
because they concerned the methods and means of performing work under
section 7106(b)(1) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations
Statute (the Statute).
Following the court's remand in FEMTC, we issued our Decision and
Order on Remand in Federal Employees Metal Trades Council, AFL-CIO and
Department of the Navy, Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, California,
25 FLRA No. 31 (1987). (Mare Island Naval Shipyard). In Mare Island
Naval Shipyard, we reviewed and reversed the Authority's previous
decision that the method of paycheck distribution concerned the methods
and means of performing work. We concluded that paycheck delivery does
not involve methods and means of performing work within the meaning of
section 7106(b)(1) of the Statute. We also concluded that: (1) the
proposals related to matters affecting working conditions of bargaining
unit employees; (2) the Agency failed to demonstrate a compelling need
for its regulations to bar negotiations on the proposals; (3) the
proposal did not interfere with the Agency's right to determine its
budget or organization; and (4) the proposals were not directly or
integrally related to the assignment of work or to determination as to
the personnel by which the Agency's operations were to be conducted.
Consistent with our decision in Mare Island Naval Shipyard, we
conclude in this case that the United States Department of Defense,
Department of the Army, McAlester Army Ammunition Plant (Respondent)
committed unfair labor practices when it failed and refused to bargain
with the Union concerning a proposed change in the method of paycheck
distribution. Accordingly, we reverse the Authority's previous decision
in this case, United States Department of Defense, Department of the
Army, McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, 20 FLRA No. 73 (1985).
II. History of the Case
A. Facts
The record indicates that since 1941, when the plant was opened,
employees had the option of receiving their paychecks on the premises or
having them mailed, either to a home address or to a bank. The record
further indicates that in 1981, at the time of the alleged change, more
than 90 percent of the 700 employees at the plant received their
paychecks on the premises. In February 1981, there were rumors at the
plant of a proposed change in the method of paycheck delivery. On
February 18, 1981, a meeting was held between the Respondent and the
Union to discuss a proposed change in the delivery of paychecks. The
Respondent presented a chart which reflected the savings that could be
achieved by mailing paychecks. The Union expressed opposition to the
change. However, there was a dispute as to the final outcome of the
discussion. The Respondent alleged that the Union agreed to the change
while the Union strongly denied that it had agreed. It was decided at
the meeting to poll the employees. The employees were polled on
February 19 and 99 percent of the employees opposed the change. On that
same day, the Union made a request to negotiate over the issue. A
meeting was held on March 2 to discuss the change further. At that
time, the Respondent stated that the issue was not negotiable and that
it would not consider negotiating with the Union since the means of
delivering paychecks was a management right. On March 12, 1981, the
employees were informed that beginning with the pay period on March 17,
1981, paychecks were to be mailed and hand delivery on the premises
would cease.
B. Administrative Law Judge's Decision
The Judge found that the established practice of the hand delivery of
employees' paychecks on the premises was a condition of employment and
that the Respondent's decision to change this established condition of
employment was not excepted from the obligation to bargain by section
7106 of the Statute. The Judge concluded that the Respondent violated
section 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Statute by the failure and refusal to
bargain in good faith with the Union prior to announcing to all
employees its decision to change the existing practice of the hand
delivery of paychecks, and prior to the implementation of its decision
on March 17, 1981.
C. Authority's Decision in 20 FLRA No. 73
In its original decision in this case, the Authority followed the
precedent established in the original Mare Island Naval Shipyard case,
16 FLRA 619. The Authority concluded that the Respondent's notice to
the Union of its intent to change the method of paycheck delivery
concerned a matter negotiable only at the election of the agency under
section 7106(b)(1) of the Statute. The Authority found that the
Respondent's refusal to bargain concerning its decision in effect
constituted notice to the Union that the Respondent would no longer be
bound by the provision concerning the permissive subject of bargaining
in the parties' agreement. The Authority concluded that the
Respondent's refusal to bargain concerning a change in the method of
paycheck delivery did not constitute a violation of section 7116(a)(1)
and (5) of the Statute. Accordingly, the Authority dismissed the unfair
labor practice complaint in its entirety.
III. Analysis and Conclusion
With the exception of one additional assertion, the Respondent's
arguments made in this unfair labor practice case are the same arguments
that were presented in Mre Island Naval Shipyard. We fully considered
those arguments in our decision on remand in that case. Accordingly,
for the reasons stated in that decision, we reject the Respondent's
contention in this case that the method of paycheck distribution is not
within its duty to bargain. As to the Respondent's additional argument,
we find, in agreement with the Judge, that the Respondent's decision to
mail paychecks using the facilities of the U.S. Postal Service, did not
constitute a determination "with respect to contracting out" within the
meaning of section 7106(a)(2)(B) of the Statute. Therefore, we find in
agreement with the Judge that the Respondent's refusal to bargain with
the Union over the proposed change in the method of paycheck
distribution violated section 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Statute.
ORDER
The United States Department of Defense, Department of the Army,
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Instituting any change in the established policy and practice of
the hand delivery of employee paychecks on the premises without first
notifying the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2815,
AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of its employees, and affording
such representative the opportunity to negotiate in good faith, to the
extent consonant with law, regulations and the Statute, prior to any
decision concerning such policy and practice.
(b) In any like or related manner, interfering with, restraining, or
coercing its employees in their rights assured by the Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the
purposes and policies of the Statute:
(a) Rescind its memorandum of February 19, 1981, entitled Subject:
"Mailing Payroll Checks" which was unlawfully implemented on March 17,
1981.
(b) Reinstate the policy and practice of the hand delivery of
paychecks on the premises as it existed prior to February 19, 1981.
(c) Notify the American Federation of Government Employees, Local
2815, AFL-CIO of any proposed change regarding the hand delivery of
paychecks on the premises and, upon request, negotiate with such
representative to the extent consonant with law and regulations on any
such proposal.
(d) Post at its facility at the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant,
McAlester, Oklahoma, copies of attached Notice on forms to be furnished
by the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms,
they shall be signed by the Commanding Officer, McAlester Army
Ammunition Plant and shall be posted for 60 consecutive days thereafter
in conspicuous places, including all bulletin boards and other places
where notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps
shall be taken to ensure that the Notices are not altered, defaced, or
covered by any other material.
(e) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the Federal Labor Relations
Authority's Rules and Regulations, notify the Regional Director, Region
VI, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this Order, what steps
have been taken to comply with this Order.
Issued, Washington, D.C., March 13, 1987.
/s/ Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman
/s/ Henry B. Frazier III, Member
/s/ Jean McKee, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS
AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71
OF TITLE
5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS
WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:
WE WILL NOT institute any change in the established policy and
practice of the hand delivery of employee paychecks on the premises
without first notifying the American Federation of Government Employees,
Local 2815, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of our employees, and
affording it the opportunity to negotiate in good faith, to the extent
consonant with law and regulations, prior to any decision concerning
such policy and practice.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner, interfere with, restrain
or coerce our employees in the exercise of their rights assured by the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
WE WILL rescind and withdraw our memorandum of February 19, 1981
entitled, Subject: "Mailing Payroll Checks" which was unlawfully
implemented on March 17, 1981.
WE WILL FORTHWITH reinstate the policy and practice of the hand
delivery of payroll checks on the premises as it existed prior to
February 19, 1981.
WE WILL notify the American Federation of Government Employees, Local
2815, AFL-CIO, of any proposed change regarding the hand delivery of
paychecks on the premises and will, upon request, negotiate with such
representative, to the extent consonant with law and regulations, on any
such proposal.
(Agency or Activity)
Dated: . . . By: (Signature)
This Notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date
of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other
material.
If employees have any questions concerning this Notice or compliance
with any of its provisions, any employee may communicate directly with
the Regional Director, Region VI, Federal Labor Relations Authority,
whose address is 525 Griffin Street, Suite 926, Dallas, Texas 75202 and
whose telephone number is: (214) 767-4996.