FLRA.gov

U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Search form

35:0674(75)CA - - EPA and NFFE Local 2050 - - 1990 FLRAdec CA - - v35 p674

Other Files: 


[ v35 p674 ]
35:0674(75)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:


35 FLRA No. 75

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

(Respondent)

and

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

LOCAL 2050

(Charging Party)

3-CA-90253

DECISION AND ORDER

April 25, 1990

Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.

I. Statement of the Case

The Administrative Law Judge issued the attached decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had not engaged in the unfair labor practice alleged in the complaint. The complaint alleged that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) by establishing regularly scheduled Sunday hours of operation for the Fairchild Building without giving the Charging Party prior notice and affording it the opportunity to negotiate over the impact and implementation of this change in conditions of employment.

The General Counsel filed exceptions. The Respondent filed an opposition to the General Counsel's exceptions.

Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, we have reviewed the rulings of the Judge made at the hearing and find that no prejudicial error was committed. We affirm the rulings. Upon consideration of the Judge's Decision and the entire record, we adopt the Judge's findings, conclusion, and recommended Order dismissing the complaint.

II. Order

The complaint is dismissed.




FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not have footnotes.)