[ v44 p77 ]
The decision of the Authority follows:
44 FLRA No. 7
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
DECISION AND ORDER
February 25, 1992
Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.
I. Statement of the Case
The Administrative Law Judge issued the attached decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent did not violate section 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) because the Respondent had not, as alleged, unlawfully refused to negotiate on the subject of an alternate work schedule or rescinded an alternate work schedule at one of its facilities prior to the completion of negotiations over the change. The Judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed. The General Counsel filed exceptions to the Judge's decision. The Respondent filed an opposition to the exceptions.
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, we have reviewed the rulings of the Judge made at the hearing and find that no prejudicial error was committed. We affirm the rulings. Upon consideration of the Judge's decision and the entire record, we adopt the Judge's findings, conclusions and recommended Order.(*)
The complaint in this case is dismissed.
(If blank, the decision does not have footnotes.)
*/ In view of the outcome of this case, we find it unnecessary to pass on the Judge's conclusions in footnote 7 of his decision.