DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 2750th AIR BASE WING WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OHIO and LOCAL 2333, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS AFL-CIO
In the Matter of
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
2750th AIR BASE WING
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OHIO
Case No. 91 FSIP 293
LOCAL 2333, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS
The Department of the Air Force, 2750th Air Base Wing,
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (Employer) and Local 2333, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (Union) filed a joint request with the Federal Service Impasses Panel (Panel) to consider a negotiation impasse under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (Statute), 5 U.S.C. § 7119.
After investigation of the request for assistance, the Panel determined that the impasse, concerning procedures for termination of dues withholding allotments, should be resolved through written submissions from the parties, with the Panel to take whatever action it deemed appropriate to resolve the impasse. Written submissions were made pursuant to this procedure and the Panel has considered the entire record.
The mission of the 2750th Air Base Wing, the host unit on
the base. is to maintain most of its 1,600 buildings; it provides grounds maintenance, in addition to transportation, payroll, personnel, recreational, and police and fire protection services. It also operates a runway complex that has an average of 100,000 takeoffs and landings yearly. The Union represents a bargaining unit consisting of approximately 762 Wage Grade employees, the majority of whom hold positions in maintenance. Currently, the parties are abiding by a collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) which was scheduled to expire on March 22, 1990; they have agreed, however, to extend it until a successor is negotiated and implemented. The dispute arose during negotiations over a new term agreement.
The parties disagree over (1) the "window period" during which Union members may revoke dues withholding,1/ and (2) who may distribute to them dues revocation forms, known as SF-1188s.
The current practice, as stated in the existing CBA, is as follows:
Section 35.7. Employee requests for termination of dues withholding will be effective the first full pay period following 1 September, provided the revocation is received by the Payroll Office on or before 1 September. It is the employee's responsibility to see that his written revocation is received in the Accounting and Finance Branch on a timely basis. SF 1188s will be provided to the employee by the Chairman of the Union Shop Committee.
1/ By way of background, under 5 U.S.C § 7115(a) and (b) of the Statute, once an employee makes an assignment for the payment of regular and periodic dues to the exclusive representative of the bargaining unit, that assignment may not be revoked for a period of 1 year with the following exceptions as provided for in § 7115(b): (1) the agreement between the agency and the exclusive representative involved ceases to be applicable to the employee; i.e., the employee is promoted into a nonbargaining-unit position, or (2) the employee is suspended or expelled from membership in the exclusive representative's organization.
POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES
1. The Employer's Position
The Employer proposes the following:
Employee requests for termination of dues withholding will be
effective the first full pay period following the particular
anniversary date (the anniversary date is the starting date of the
first pay period for which dues were deducted from the employee's
pay), providing the revocation is received by the Civilian Pay
Unit during the 30-day period prior to the anniversary date. It is
the employee's responsibility to see that his written revocation
is received in the Civilian Pay Unit on a timely basis.2/ SF-1188s
will be provided upon request to the employee by the Chairman of
the Union Shop Committee, the Labor Relations Unit or the Civilian
It argues that a 30-day window of opportunity for employees to submit a dues revocation form is reasonable because it provides a definitive time frame for employees to make a change. Moreover, establishing a definitive period during which employees may make such changes is consistent with other opportunities for employees to make periodic adjustments affecting their pay such as the "open season" for changing health insurance plans, and the open seasons for employees to initiate, terminate, or modify Thrift Savings Plan
enrollment. As to the distribution of dues revocation forms, allowing the Labor Relations Unit to distribute them is consistent with agreements the Employer has reached with two other unions representing employees assigned to the base. The Labor
/ In a conference call with the parties on February 20, 1992, the Union confirmed that it has agreed to that aspect of the Employer's proposal which would make it the employee's responsibility to ensure that the revocation form is timely received by the Civilian Pay Unit.
3/ During mediation, the Union agreed to allow members of the Civilian Pay Unit to distribute SF-1188s to employees; therefore, the only dispute as to distribution of the forms is whether the Labor Relations Unit also may issue them to employees.
Relations Unit is capable of maintaining a neutral role on union membership while distributing dues revocation forms; evidence of this is the fact that there have been no allegations of improprieties with respect to the other bargaining units to which it distributes revocation forms. Furthermore, since members of the Labor Relations Unit are knowledgeable about the dues withholding and revocation process they would be able to answer questions posed by employees while members of the Civilian Pay Unit may not.
2. The Union's Position
The Union proposes that employee requests for termination of d