… "A . . . I had told him if he didn't - - if they did a ULP on me, why didn't he file on them? And if he didn't, I … "A . . . I had told him if he didn't - - if they did a ULP on me, why didn't he file on them? And if he didn't, I … "A . . . I had told him if he didn't - - if they did a ULP on me, why didn't he file on them? And if he didn't, I …
… PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This is an unfair labor practice (ULP) proceeding under the Federal Service Labor- Management … PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This is an unfair labor practice (ULP) proceeding under the Federal Service Labor- Management … PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This is an unfair labor practice (ULP) proceeding under the Federal Service Labor- Management …
… in January 1992. The Regional Director dismissed the ULP charge filed by the Union in Case No. SF-CA-20270 on the … in January 1992. The Regional Director dismissed the ULP charge filed by the Union in Case No. SF-CA-20270 on the … in January 1992. The Regional Director dismissed the ULP charge filed by the Union in Case No. SF-CA-20270 on the …
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY Office of Administrative Law Judges WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424-0001 U.S. PENITENTIARY LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS Respondent and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 919 Charging Party Case Nos. …
… was a MOU drawn up in 1991 in settlement of an earlier ULP wherein Respondent had agreed to make future Operating … was a MOU drawn up in 1991 in settlement of an earlier ULP wherein Respondent had agreed to make future Operating … was a MOU drawn up in 1991 in settlement of an earlier ULP wherein Respondent had agreed to make future Operating …
… up and walked out of the negotiating session and filed an ULP. (Tr. 22). Mr. Paul's charge (G.C. Exh. 1A-2) became, … up and walked out of the negotiating session and filed an ULP. (Tr. 22). Mr. Paul's charge (G.C. Exh. 1A-2) became, … up and walked out of the negotiating session and filed an ULP. (Tr. 22). Mr. Paul's charge (G.C. Exh. 1A-2) became, …
… Ex. 2; Tr. 12) The Union filed the unfair labor practice (ULP) charge in this case on March 26, 2004. (G.C. Ex. 1(a)) … Ex. 2; Tr. 12) The Union filed the unfair labor practice (ULP) charge in this case on March 26, 2004. (G.C. Ex. 1(a)) … Ex. 2; Tr. 12) The Union filed the unfair labor practice (ULP) charge in this case on March 26, 2004. (G.C. Ex. 1(a)) …
… of March 26, the National VA Council will file a national ULP on the unilateral implementation of the AWS experiment. … of March 26, the National VA Council will file a national ULP on the unilateral implementation of the AWS experiment. … of March 26, the National VA Council will file a national ULP on the unilateral implementation of the AWS experiment. …
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424-0001 UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, HARLINGEN, TEXAS Respondent and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, NATIONAL BORDER PATROL COUNCIL, …
… employee, it would assert jurisdiction “when the ULP focuses on the union’s institutional interest in … employee, it would assert jurisdiction “when the ULP focuses on the union’s institutional interest in … employee, it would assert jurisdiction “when the ULP focuses on the union’s institutional interest in …
